Wednesday, January 30, 2008

American deserter defends actions

American deserter defends actions

http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/Local/2008/01/27/4795930-sun.html

Sun, January 27, 2008
By KATHY RUMLESKI, FREE PRESS REPORTER

Speaking in reserved tones and noting he wasn't telling his audience
the worst of his encounters, a young American war resister explained
yesterday why he had to get away from duty in Iraq.

At the beginning of January, Josh Randall, 20, returned to the United
States for an 18-day break and determined he would never go back to
work as a medic with the armed forces in Iraq.

"I found out how wrong this war is. I flew into Detroit and I crossed
the border in Windsor," Randall told a small crowd at the London
Central Library gathered to hear him and another resister, Linjamin
Mull, speak.

"I was exposed to many things I don't have the intestinal fortitude
to talk about in front of people," said Randall, whose wife is from London.

But what the Texas native did say was tragic and disturbing.

Randall tended to a 10-year-old boy housed in a detainee centre in
Iraq who was so scared of him he was shaking and crying.

"He was deathly afraid of me."

Involved in a raid on a household, Randall had to walk away from a
small girl injured from explosive splinters in her stomach when U.S.
forces moved in to look for "supposed terrorists," he said.

Randall was told not to worry about the child because she would be
taken to hospital.

He argued: "I've been to the local hospital. I know they can't fix this.

"I still regret not arguing more."

Finally, when Randall looked into the face of a dying soldier and he
couldn't help him, he knew he had to get out.

"He looks at me and says, 'Why?' I had no answer about why this guy died."

Randall has found safe harbour in London and he's applying for
permanent residency in Canada.

"We're going to protect you," a woman at the back of the room
promised when Randall had finished his speech.

Randall could face as much as 15 years in prison for desertion.

He said he feels confident he won't be hounded by the U.S. military
as it doesn't have the time to track down him or others.

Yesterday was the National Day of Action in support of U.S. war
resisters and about 50 American veterans of the Iraq War and others
gathered at the Canadian Embassy in Washington to demand that the
Canadian government allow hundreds of resisters to remain in Canada.

Locally, the War Resisters Support Group of London organized the
library event, wrote letters to MPs and sold T-shirts and buttons to
help support Randall, Mull and another U.S. resister living here.

.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Combat, family stress bring soldier to desert

Combat, family stress bring soldier to desert

http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/News/Headlines/frtHEAD05012608.htm

By AUDREY PARENTE
Staff Writer
January 26, 2008

Early December 2007:

In the midst of a desperate firefight in Iraq, as shots ricocheted
around him, Sgt. Allen Robert "Robby" Keller IV froze for a moment.
Any soldier knows that can be a death sentence.

The 23-year-old had enlisted at 19 "to get on a good financial foot
for college." For months before that terrible instant of immobility,
his combat stress had led to sleeplessness, nightmares and loss of
appetite. He was wracked with worry about his wife, Michaelagh, at
home having problems with her second pregnancy.

For the first time in his four-year military career, during his
second deployment, Keller was losing control, having an emotional breakdown.

He made it safely out of the streets and sought help. He was soon
going to be headed home on leave to Holly Hill. He had "aid from the
combat stress people" in the form of medication, and surely
everything would be OK.

While Keller was on leave, his wife went into early labor, and on
Christmas Day she had her baby boy in Canada, her native land.

Keller was supposed to be away from his post for only a few weeks,
but on Dec. 26 things changed.

That's when Keller went absent without leave.

He hasn't returned to his unit, and as of today he remains in Canada
and will be dropped from the rolls at Fort Drum, N.Y., as a deserter
and a warrant will be issued for his arrest.

Last year 4,698 soldiers deserted the Army, a number that has grown
steadily. The number is more than 80 percent above the count for
2003, during the start of the Iraq War.

The Department of Defense said approximately 76 percent of the 2007
deserters were first-term soldiers.

"Desertion in the Army isn't the huge problem as it has been
portrayed by some organizations that assist soldiers who have
deserted or by some of the soldiers themselves," said Lt. Col. George
Wright, spokesman for the Army. "The vast majority of American
soldiers serve their country admirably and honorably. On average, the
number of soldiers who desert is less than 1 percent."

Although Keller doesn't fit the "first-term" profile, Wright said
military studies show most soldiers desert because of personal,
family or financial problems, not for political or conscientious
objector purposes.

Keller's reasons are related to combat and to his family.

During his first yearlong deployment, Keller said his battalion lost
only a few soldiers. But his second time in Iraq didn't go as well.

"This time we lost eight and one to suicide, and the amount of
contact has been higher, a lot of casualties, and one of my buddies
is paralyzed," said Keller, a sniper team leader. Keller was
interviewed for this story by phone and by e-mail.

Then came his breakdown in the field. He sought medical help and
applied for an early leave.

"The night I came home in early December, my wife went right into
early labor. We went to the hospital in New York. She was only 33
weeks, so they stopped the labor and gave her meds," Keller said.

The couple spent some of Keller's leave time together in Volusia
County, where he grew up, where the couple married and where most of
his family lives.

"My wife wanted to be closer to her family and did not want to be in
the States. I really wanted the baby born in the States, but at this
time nothing was going my way, so I followed her up to Canada," Keller said.

On Christmas Eve, Michaelagh went into labor again. At 6:01 Christmas
morning, Grai Jacob William Keller was born.

On Christmas night, Keller heard from his commander with orders to
get on the plane and head back to Iraq.

"I was to leave at 5 a.m. in the morning. My commander told me that
there was too much going on in Iraq at this time to settle my problem
right now and that they would want me to come back and fix it there," he said.

"I know what they have to offer there and there's nothing to fix me
over there, so after spending two days in the hospital with my wife
and son, I made up my mind that I was not going back. I was staying
to be with my family. No matter what."

At Fort Drum, Keller's stateside base, public affairs spokesman
Benjamin Abel said that if a soldier needs help, "we cannot help if
you are not here."

He said it's a "soldier's responsibility to be at his place of duty,"
and if not, he is breaking the law.

Keller knows this. "So now I'm AWOL and on the run, but to me it is
worth it 100 percent," he said. "I've done my time. I fought the
battles and continue to do so every time I fall asleep."

What happens next, according to the Department of Defense, is not
much of anything, other than the warrant issued for Keller's arrest.

"We do not actively look for deserters, but they can be returned to
military control by civilian law enforcement," Wright said. "This
normally happens when police check the identification during a traffic stop."

He said the "maximum punishment for desertion in a time of war is
death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct." No
recent deserters have received the maximum punishment and such a
sentence would be unlikely, he said.

Keller said this has not been an easy decision, but he believes in his choice.

"I've suppressed my issues and as long as I'm awake, I seem to be
fine. After much struggle, when I can finally fall asleep, I have
hideous dreams that are so real. My wife can't sleep in the same bed
as me. . . . My dreams bring me back to Iraq every night," Keller said.

He said he's even spoken to his commander a few times by phone since
his desertion.

"My commander knows me as a person," he said. "We have talked several
times before and I had even seen him before I left Iraq to tell him
about my issues a bit, so this was not a fully new issue to him. At
this time I'm doing the right thing."
---
audrey.parente@news-jrnl.com
---

Canada a haven for U.S. deserters

· An estimated 90 percent of nearly 100,000 draft and military
resisters during the Vietnam War went to Canada.

· Canadian law has changed from the welcoming Vietnam era; now
would-be-immigrants have to apply for residency and convince a
Canadian immigration board they are refugees.

· Jeffry House, a Toronto lawyer and Vietnam draft dodger who
represents deserters, reported receiving 100 inquiries from service
members in 2005.

· Military deserters publicly embraced new lives in Canada, supported
by a visit from "peace mom" Cindy Sheehan in 2006. She said she
wished the son she lost in Iraq was among them.

SOURCES: Compiled by Audrey Parente from afsc.org; cbs.news.com; New
York Newsday; Washington Post
---

Penalty for AWOL, desertion

· Commanders have discretion to retain and rehabilitate,
administratively separate, or court-martial AWOL or deserted soldiers
returned to military control.

· Administrative action is not punitive but meant to be corrective
and rehabilitative.

· Maximum punishment for AWOL is a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture
of all pay and confinement for six months.

· For desertion with intent to avoid hazardous duty or shirk service,
some charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice carry such
punishments as dishonorable discharge, five years' confinement,
forfeiture of all pay and reduction to private. The maximum penalty
for desertion in time of war is death or such punishment as a
court-martial may direct.

SOURCE: Department of Defense
---

Did You Know?

Desertion through the ages:

· Deserters in the Roman Army, during the 4th Century B.C., were
subject to the death penalty as a deterrent. But in practice,
enforcement was rare. Clubbing and stoning was the method when enforced.

· In the French Foreign Legion during the 1800s, desertion carried a
penalty of 40 days in the Legion jail, often characterized as "the
last hell on Earth."

· Death penalties for U.S. Civil War desertions were enforced in both
Union and Confederate armies.

· During World War II, desertion was punishable by death by firing
squad, and Pvt. Eddie Slovik became an example.

· More than 1.5 million AWOLs were documented during the Vietnam War,
and desertion rates hit an all-time high during 1971 and 1972. Many
went to jail or received dishonorable discharges.

.

War Resisters in Canada Face Deportation and Prison

US War Resisters in Canada Face Deportation and Prison: You Can Help Them

http://pacificfreepress.com/content/view/2216/81/

Sunday, 27 January 2008
by Laura Kaminker

We all dream of peace. But what have we sacrificed to make peace a
reality? Some American men and women have risked everything to help
end the Iraq War. And right now they need our help.

"Hundreds of United States servicepeople have refused to participate
in the US occupation of Iraq. Some of these war resisters, now
"absent without leave," have gone to Canada, but Canada has not yet
granted them asylum. "

In fact, deportation proceedings have begun against some resisters.
If forced to return to the U.S., they face court martial, military
prison and damaging criminal records.

We can't let this happen.

Perhaps you wonder, as many people do, if these men and women didn't
want to fight in Iraq, then why did they enlist?

Some joined the United States military because of "the poverty
draft": they had no health insurance, no money for education, and
very few options. Military recruiters were a permanent fixture in
their high schools, peddling a seductive package of false hope and
lies. For a view into the poverty draft, I highly recommend reading
The Deserter's Tale, written by war resister Joshua Key and Canadian
author Lawrence Hill.

Others volunteered after September 11, 2001, because they wanted to
help prevent more terrorist attacks. Some resisters served in
Afghanistan, but refused deployment to Iraq.

Most came from homes and communities where people didn't question the
government. There were terrorists over there and we had to get them
before they got us over here. That's what they were told, and they
had no reason to doubt it.

Then they went to Iraq.

There, they saw for themselves that the entire pretence for the
invasion and the occupation was a lie. And they saw - to their shock
and horror - that in Iraq, the United States were the terrorists.

Some served out their contracts and were discharged, only to be
"stop-lossed": involuntarily re-enlisted. Others came home on leave
and refused to return. They didn't want to die for a lie. And they
didn't want to kill.

Their actions, though moral, were illegal. In the US, they faced
military prison and a "bad conduct discharge" - a felony offense -
for refusing to deploy. So they left their families and friends, left
their country, and went north, to Canada. Many have been ostracized
from their families, who condemn them as cowards. One resister told
me his mother said she'd rather he died in Iraq than shamed them by deserting.

"With the help of the War Resisters Support Campaign,

http://www.resisters.ca/ a coalition of activists (many of whom were
Vietnam War resisters, now Canadian citizens), about 50 servicepeople
have applied for refugee status to live legally in Canada. (It is
thought that a few hundred additional resisters are living
underground in Canada.) "

Because of the current Conservative government, and the repressive
post-9/11 political climate, every resister's request for asylum has
been rejected by the Immigration and Refugee Board. In November, the
Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear the cases of Brandon Hughey
and Jeremy Hinzman, the first resisters to apply.

At that time, some US media implied that the resisters' cause had
been defeated - but that is not true. It was a huge disappointment,
but it was also a new beginning for the movement.

The War Resisters Support Campaign stepped up its political efforts.
It determined to deploy the greatest weapon for peace that Canada
possesses: the Canadian people.

Canada did not participate in the invasion of Iraq, and the huge
majority of Canadians oppose the Iraq War. Unlike in the US, Canadian
representatives actually listen and respond to their constituents!
The Support Campaign has been urging Canadians to contact their
Members of Parliament with one message: Let Them Stay.

The Conservative government led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper is
not sympathetic to the war resisters - but it is a minority
government. This means the united opposition - the Liberals, the New
Democratic Party (NDP) and the Bloc Québécois - outnumber the
Conservatives. The Campaign proposed that a resolution be passed in
the House of Commons allowing US war resisters to remain legally in Canada.

The NDP quickly advanced the resolution and the Bloc added its
support. But, although many Liberal Members of Parliament personally
support the resisters, the Liberal Party has not officially supported
the resolution.

In December - thanks to the Campaign's persistent lobbying efforts,
and members of the three opposition parties working together - the
Committee on Immigration recommended that the resolution be passed.
It was a huge victory.

Now the resolution has been introduced in the House of Commons; a
united opposition is needed to pass it. If the NDP, Bloc and Liberals
all vote in favour of the resolution, the Conservative government is
not actually obligated to implement it, but it would be an
unprecedented breach of trust - not to mention democracy - if they did not.

Support campaign organizers believe they are very close to getting
the resolution passed - but they don't have much time. Deportation
proceedings have already begun against four resisters, including two
families with young children. Will the House of Commons pass the
resolution before any war resisters are deported?

In discussing this issue with supposedly progressive Americans, I was
shocked - and frankly disgusted - to learn that some people who
oppose the war in Iraq do not support the war resisters' cause. Their
argument: "If they didn't join in the first place, there wouldn't be a war!"

This strikes me as both extremely naïve and horribly selfish.

Many of us were fortunate to grow up in homes where questioning
authority was encouraged, where dissent and protest were a way of
life - not to mention in families that could afford higher education
and health care. If you cannot imagine what kind of background might
lead someone to enlist in the US military, I again recommend The
Deserter's Tale.

But even if we never would have made such a choice, do we want to see
people who have experienced such a radical change of mind punished
for their beliefs? Isn't this the very change of heart that we wish
to instill in others? And most importantly, should a person be
imprisoned for refusing to kill?

Many of us always knew the invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with
stopping terrorism or spreading democracy. If the war resisters have
come to this truth a little later, they have done so at a much
greater price. If we are truly people of peace, it is our moral
obligation to stand beside people who have risked everything to help
end this war.

"In the US, On Friday, January 25, Americans will demonstrate in
front of Canadian consulates in six cities. "

The effort is spearheaded by Courage To Resist and joined by Military
Families Speak Out, Iraq Veterans Against the War and the thousands
of local peace groups that belong to United for Peace and Justice.
You can join demonstrations in Washington DC, New York, San
Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle and Minneapolis. (Details at
http://couragetoresist.org.)

"In Canada, Saturday, January 26, is a Pan-Canadian Day of Action in
support of war resisters. "

Events will be held in 12 cities, where Canadians will write letters
demanding that the resolution be passed.

Everyone can write letters to Prime Minister Stephen Harper and
Liberal leader Stéphane Dion.

"This is a crucial part of the campaign. See Courage To Resist's
"Dear Canada" campaign (couragetoresist.org) or the War Resisters
Support Campaign (resisters.ca). "

By the time the Canadian Parliament resumes on January 29, Liberal
leader Stéphane Dion will have received hundreds, maybe thousands, of
letters, all demanding one thing: Let Them Stay.

During the Vietnam War, at least 50,000 - possibly as many as 80,000
- Americans went to Canada to escape the draft or because they did
not want to live in a country that would perpetrate such an immoral,
needless war.

What many people don't know is that Canada did not immediately allow
the Vietnam resisters to stay. The Canadian peace movement campaigned
on behalf of the resisters and pressured their government to do the
right thing.

"Finally, Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau said,
"Canada should be a refuge from militarism." '

Once again, Canadians are calling on Canada to be a refuge from
militarism. You can help make this happen.
---

Laura Kaminker, a writer, moved from the United States to Canada for
political reasons. She now works with the War Resisters Support
Campaign in Toronto.

.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

From the U.S. Army to Canada: a resister's journey

From the U.S. Army to Canada: a resister's journey

http://www.rabble.ca/in_his_own_words.shtml?x=66749

by Brad McCall
January 24, 2008

If I went to the United States border crossing right now, I would be
arrested. That's right. As a matter of fact, a couple of weeks ago a
man hired to transport my vehicle back to the United States was held
at gunpoint by a U.S. border guard because he was suspected of being
me. Am I really that dangerous?

My being here in Canada is a true blessing. It's a lot better than
being in a prison in the United States.

By now, you are probably very curious about what my crime is. Well,
in short, I am guilty of desertion. That's right, I deserted the
United States Army. But if one digs a little more deeply into what I
have done, they may learn the truth of the matter: I am a victim of
an unjust system.

I joined the U.S. Army on August 28, 2006, after learning that not
only would I be serving my country, as every young man should, but
that I would also be receiving benefits such as: Tricare universal
healthcare, a $400,000 life insurance policy, a $37,000 Montgomery GI
Bill, a $10,000 signing bonus, a dependable monthly income, and, last
but not least, career training for when my contract reached its
completion. As a 19 year-old kid recently independent from his
parents, one might say that I needed what they were offering me. And
I took it.

I went through the system fairly smoothly. No discipline problems. No
UCMJ actions. No Article 13s. I was just another private swimming
through a sea of conformity, trying not to stand out. (Although, when
you read Voltaire on your breaks, I guess you're going to stand out a
little). I was stationed at Fort Carson, Colorado. A soldier in A
Company, 1/67 Armour, 4th Infantry Division, I soon became a central
focus for many jokes. I was referred to by my fellow soldiers as a
"hippie", "commie", and "faggot" – just to name a few. Times were,
well, quite depressing.

Then came the stories from Iraq. Men in my unit who had already
served in Iraq were one day explaining the various situations that
they had encountered while "down range". One Sergeant explained how
he shot a man in an alleyway just for being out after dark. He
expressed how easy it was to kill "hajjis" once you did it for the
first time. I listened as one soldier told how a specialist in my
unit kept a human finger in his wall locker during his entire tour of
duty. The laughing ensued as I heard the story of a soldier in
another company eating the charred flesh of an Iraqi civilian, the
unfortunate victim of an IED attack aimed at American forces. I
thought about how callous these men had become, and how horrified I
was at the idea of disrespecting human life in such a manner. This is
when doubt began to flood my mind.

I began to regret ever signing the dreadful contract that imprisoned
me. I became a recluse from my family. I began a rebellion of the
mind, realizing that I was no longer a staunch defender of my nation,
but that I now wore on my shoulder an emblem of hate and greed. I
found alternate news sources to rely on, seeing that up until this
point in my life I had relied on conservative news reports. I was
building a new me, and the new me could not become an animal,
accustomed to the needless loss of human life. So, when I realized
that my tour of duty in Iraq was soon approaching, I immediately
asked my chain of command for conscientious objector status. I was laughed at.

After repeatedly being told that my claim would be denied, I began
researching alternate methods of living freely, without the guilt of
forcing the will of imperialism on an innocent people. And then I
learned of Canada. Dearest Canada. Pierre Trudeau described Canada as
being a "refuge from militarism." After all, hadn't over 100 000
Vietnam era draft resisters fled to Canada? And what better place to
go than a place with over 50 000 of those original "war resisters"
still living and prospering within its borders. And so the decision
was made. I was preparing for Canada.

Nervous is an understatement to describe the way I was feeling when I
arrived at the Canadian border. But I had confidence, knowing that
thousands of Americans crossed into Canada every day. There was no
need for me to worry. But later, as I was being driven to the Surrey
jail in handcuffs, I understood that something was amiss.

I had been drilled at the border. An officer by the name of Marcotte
had interviewed me and told me how I would be in jail during my
entire brief stay in Canada, until American authorities would come to
pick me up. The acting superintendent, John Cumblidge, asked me
repeatedly to return to the United States of my own free will, and
that there was no point in attempting to stay in Canada. But I knew
in my heart that I belonged here. I knew that I had a mission, and
that was to fight for my right to moral choice. So, after a gruelling
refugee application process, and a two-night stay in jail, I was
released. I stepped into the Vancouver rain as a new, free man. I was
different, no longer able to be subjected to the rising tide of
conformity. The time had come for me to take a stand.

Yes, I had volunteered. Yes, at the time, I completely agreed with
the mission in Iraq. No, I did not understand the full scope of
things, and how horrific the situation truly is. I know, I should
have never signed my contract. But at the time, I knew no better.

A change of heart, some would call it. A change of soul is more like
it. For today, as I sit here in Vancouver, Canada, I am a different
person. I no longer consider myself to be an American, for my
country, in not granting me the freedom to moral choice, has betrayed
me. And seeing that, so far, the Canadian government has denied the
refugee claims of others like me, I guess that I am at loss for a
country to call my home. But it is a lot better for me to be without
a nation than to be a war criminal.
---

This Saturday, January 26, is a pan-Canadian day of action in support
of U.S. war resisters, with events planned in at least ten cities. To
find the war resisters support action near you, check out resisters.ca.

.

Iraq vets call for Winter Soldier investigation

Iraq vets call for Winter Soldier investigation

http://www.workers.org/2008/us/iraq_vets_0124/

By Dee Knight
Published Jan 17, 2008

Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) has announced plans for "Winter
Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan," from March 13 to 16. The event "will
assemble the largest gathering of U.S. veterans of Iraq and
Afghanistan in history, as well as Iraqi and Afghan survivors," IVAW
says, "to offer first-hand, eyewitness accounts to tell the truth
about these occupations­their impact on the troops, their families,"
the United States "and the people of Iraq and Afghanistan."

IVAW is asking the larger anti-war movement to call no national
mobilizations and no local protests or civil disobedience actions in
Washington, D.C., on that long weekend. "IVAW would support any
events that do not interfere with the Winter Soldier hearings, our
strategy, or goals," they said. "We would encourage our members to
continue participating in events of the larger movement to end the
occupation of Iraq, as we acknowledge both the significance and the
necessity of such actions."

Thomas Paine, a writer and political activist who promoted the
revolution for U.S. independence from Britain in the 18th century,
said winter soldiers are those who stand up even in the most
difficult hours of struggle. "With this spirit in mind," IVAW says,
"our members are standing up to make their experiences available to
all who are concerned about the direction of our country."

This is the second Winter Soldier investigation: in 1971, members of
Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) gathered in Detroit to share
their stories. Atrocities like the My Lai massacre had ignited
popular opposition to the war, but political and military leaders
insisted that such crimes were isolated exceptions. The members of
VVAW testified at that time on the systematic brutality they had seen
visited upon the people of Vietnam.

"Over 30 years later," IVAW says, "we find ourselves faced with a new
war, but the lies are the same. Once again, [U.S.] troops are sinking
into an increasingly bloody occupation. Once again, war crimes in
places like Haditha, Fallujah and Abu Ghraib have turned the public
against the war. Once again, politicians and generals are blaming 'a
few bad apples' instead of examining the military policies that have
destroyed Iraq and Afghanistan."
Support needed

IVAW wants as many people as possible to attend the event. It is
planning to provide live broadcasting of the sessions for those who
cannot hear the testimony firsthand. "We have been inspired by the
tremendous support the movement has shown us," IVAW says. "We believe
the success of Winter Soldier will ultimately depend on the support
of our allies and the hard work of our members."

Workers World spoke with IVAW National Board members Camilo Mejia and
Margaret Stevens about the event and other aspects of the organization's work.

Mejia spent nine months in military prison from May 2004 to February
2005 for refusing to return to Iraq after his first tour of duty
there. He has been speaking and organizing since his release. He was
chosen to chair the IVAW National Board at its conference last
August. He told WW the organization is growing fast­from about 500 in
August to more than 700 now, with members in 48 states, Washington,
D.C., Canada, and on numerous bases both here and overseas, including Iraq.

Commenting on the recent mutiny by a platoon of soldiers in Iraq,
Mejia said this type of resistance is increasingly common there. "I
refused a mission once," he said. "We had watched several of our
comrades be killed and wounded. I said no­as squad leader­that I
would not allow my guys to be used as bait for some colonel to make general."

Margaret Stevens, who is IVAW's National Board treasurer, said, "My
stint in the anti-war movement began before the official invasion was
declared in 2003. As a member of the New Jersey Army National Guard
from 1997 to 2004, I counted myself among the soldiers who questioned
the goals, values and actions of the U.S. military even during times
of so-called peace."

A resident of Newark, N.J., and a professor at Essex Community
College, Stevens says, "We need to develop a strong voice in the
northern New Jersey region. Until we can link the fight against
imperialist war overseas to the fight against racism and sexism in
the U.S., we are missing the point."

Stevens told WW last August that Mejia's political statement at the
IVAW convention "was that we need to look at the root of the
problem­not just the war but the capitalist system. People responded
positively to this." She said the northern New Jersey chapter of
IVAW, which had its first meetings in December, has gotten off to a
strong start. More than 40 people attended the chapter's first
holiday party, most of them veterans, but also from Military Families
Speak Out, the People's Organization for Progress of Jersey City, and others.

The IVAW, Stevens said, "will have a three-pronged approach: truth in
recruiting; mobilization of active duty soldiers; defending war
resisters." There is rich detail on each of these initiatives, as
well as ways to help build the Winter Soldier activity, on the
group's Web site: www.ivaw.org.

.

Friday, January 25, 2008

Make War No More

Make War No More

http://www.gtweekly.com/make-war-no-more

UC Santa Cruz grad Robert Zabala on the war, his conscience and why
he just had to get out of the military

Written by John Malkin
Wednesday, 16 January 2008

It may sound simplistic, but I have often thought that there would be
fewer wars if people with guns stopped shooting them. Throughout
U.S. history, hundreds of soldiers have connected with their
conscience and objected to military service. But history lessons
have tended to cast a heroic light on generals and their battles
while leaving acts of conscientious objection to war on the cutting
room floor.

Robert Zabala enlisted in the U.S. Marines in 2002 but his
experiences in boot camp brought up ethical questions and led to a
deeper reflection on the interconnectedness of life. He filed a
conscientious objector application in 2004 and on March 29, 2007,
U.S. District Court Judge James Ware ruled that Zabala was to be
granted an honorable discharge and be released from the Marines
within 15 days. Zabala, a graduate of the University of California
in Santa Cruz, is now 23 years old and a resident of San Jose. Here,
he reveals his journey beyond the military.

When you joined the Marines, what was your motivation?

I was 17 years old and I really wanted to show the world that I was
made of something tough, raw and real. Also, I come from a huge long
line of people who served in the military. My grandfather served in
Vietnam. My grandmother taught officers how to speak Tagalog in
Monterey. My mother and father both were in the Navy in the Gulf War.

Probably the biggest reason that I wanted to join the Marine Corps
was that growing up a child so dependent on the welfare state, I felt
that I should pay back this debt to society. I grew up on food
stamps and free meals you get in public schools - even my college was
paid for by financial aid.

What was that recruitment experience like?

I was the easiest sucker they've ever recruited! I walked right into
that recruiting station and they told me all the things that I wanted
to hear. They said, "You're a smart guy, and a lot of the leadership
skills that you're going to learn in the Marine Corps, you're going
to be able to translate into the real world and you'll be a better
person." Man, did I fall for it.

Could you choose what you would be doing in the Marines?

The recruiters say, "Hey, you can do this kind of job – you'll work
strictly with radars." That's what I was supposed to be, a
wireman. When I got to boot camp it turns out that my recruiter
didn't do that at all. I was going to be a rifleman. And after I
graduated from boot camp, when I joined up with my reserve unit in
San Bruno, I met up with my first sergeant and he looked me over once
and said, "Hey, guess what? You're going to be a machine gunner
now." It's that funny little clause in the contract that you sign
that says at anytime they can change what you're doing or where
you're stationed.

When did you start thinking that being in the Marines wasn't going to work?

One of the earliest memories I have was in one of our classes. A lot
of people don't know this about boot camp – you spend a lot of time
in classrooms. The officer who was conducting the class said, "Hey,
I've got a reward for you." He dimmed down the lights and the video
started rolling. It was a montage of a firefight and there were
corpses, then a tank crushing a car and more firefights. Those
images flashing in front of your face in this dark room by itself is
pretty jarring. But it was combined with a song and the lyrics were,
"Let the bodies hit the floor, let the bodies hit the floor." It was
the one time in boot camp when I cried. I saw the recruits nodding,
smiling and kind of ribbing each other saying, "Wow, this is pretty
awesome." It was one of those moments when I thought, "Maybe I'm not
cut out for this."

Another one of those moments came later in boot camp. Word got out
that a recruit committed suicide on the rifle range. And the same
officer said, "Hey, I'm sure you've heard by now. There was a
recruit who committed suicide on the rifle range. But guess what
recruits, don't worry about him. He didn't have what it takes to be
a Marine. So, f­- him, f­- his parents for having sex to make him
and f­- his girlfriend for dumping him. We don't need people like
that." Again I thought, "Maybe this isn't for me."

In another class an officer sat us down and said, "Look here
recruits. I'm going to break it down what boot camp really
means. We break you down all the way to your core. Then we slowly
build you back up together to be a perfect Marine. And at the end
we'll give you a little piece of yourself." That last line really
became imbedded in my mind. How much of your self would really be
left after you graduate? Or after spending three years in Iraq? It
was disheartening.

Another time that helped change my mind was when I joined up with my
unit in San Bruno. The unit had just returned from serving time in
Iraq. I remember standing in line one day to get flu shots or
something and I looked over somebody's shoulder and what I saw
reminded me of kids looking at baseball cards. There were pictures
of corpses and people that were held captive in demeaning
positions. They were saying, "Oh, did you hear sergeant so and so
has a picture of that? Oh, I need to trade him for that one." Or,
"How'd you get that picture?" Again, I thought to myself, "Maybe
there's something wrong with me. Or maybe something's wrong with the
Marine Corps." I couldn't figure it out. It wasn't until June 2004
that I realized that I'm a conscientious objector. I can't
participate in any shape or form.

Did the soldier's suicide affect your choice to be a conscientious objector?

It played a pretty big role. If that is how they wanted us to think
of somebody who supposedly "didn't have what it takes to be a
Marine," what kind of a mentality was I supposed to take towards
people who were not only not Marines but who weren't even American?

There is a rich history of people conscientiously objecting to U.S.
wars. We tend not to learn about that in school. How did you learn
about this possibility?

I had no idea what a conscientious objector was. I just knew that I
wasn't happy at the time. I got in contact with the Resource Center
for Nonviolence in Santa Cruz through the G.I. Rights hotline. I
started talking to one of the counselors and was voicing my
unhappiness and they said, "It sounds like you might be a
conscientious objector. Do you know what that is?" "No, ma'am, I
don't." (Laughter) Looking over it myself and talking to other
people I realized, "I'm a conscientious objector."

Can you describe what it actually means to be a conscientious objector?

There are two types of conscientious objectors. One will not
participate in a role in the military that involves direct combat or
the possibility of killing somebody. And there's the other type
whose conscience in no shape or form will allow them to participate
in any military job whatsoever. For me, that's just the way it
was. They transferred me over to be an administrative assistant for
awhile but even then I saw every piece as a cog for the Marine Corps
machine. One thing people usually ask me is, "Well, why did you join
up with the military if you're a conscientious objector?" I wasn't a
conscientious objector before.

From 2000 to mid-2005, 75 U.S. Marines filed for conscientious
objector status and applications were approved in 36 cases. How did
you prove that you were a conscientious objector in court?

The first thing I had to establish was that I would not participate
in any way, shape or form. Any job in the military leads to helping
somebody kill another person and that's something I had to draw the
line at. Another thing was to prove the sincerity of my beliefs. It
was tough because I didn't say that I practiced any traditional
religion. I cited Buddhism in my application just because I found
something beautiful in Buddhism. I could definitely go to things in
the Bible, Koran or Torah that are just as beautiful that touched me
and would help back up my argument. In my case, I didn't cite any
traditional religion, so I was coming from this standpoint of my own
moral authority.

What was inspiring in Buddhism or other spiritual traditions that
supported your conscientious objection?

I think that the Marine Corps shot itself in the foot. They tell
you, "Hey, it's Sunday. Go worship something, get out of my
face." So I thought, "Well, I used to be a Catholic but I'm not
interested anymore. Let's try Buddhism." So, I got a little
Buddhist book with a lot of different things to read in there.

If you kill one person there is all the grief that surrounds that
person and ripples out to their loved ones. I knew that if I
participated in killing somebody, I'd aid in this kind of cacophony
of grief and pain. That was just something that I couldn't do. One
big thing is empathy; the ability to see where other people are
coming from and to let go of negative energy.

What was the court process like?

It took a long time for them to push papers all the way up the chain
of command. At one point they said that my papers were lost in
Hurricane Katrina. I wrote to my local congressman and after he made
a phone call they found out pretty quickly where they were. Thank
you Sam Farr.

I imagine that while some people have been supportive of your
CO-status, likely others have not been sympathetic.

You are exactly right. One of my friends enlisted with me and he
went to Iraq three times in four years. He didn't understand. And
every month when these Marines saw me still in the unit they were
questioning, "Why is Zabala still here? I thought he submitted his
paperwork a year ago." People started wondering, "Man, the Marine
Corps is f­-ed up. This guy doesn't want to kill anybody! I don't
want anybody like that watching my back in Iraq." They started
doubting themselves, and their cohesiveness wasn't there anymore.

Do you think that we're moving toward more compassion and fewer wars?

I hope that we can get it done. I feel like there is a slow
progression toward people being more understanding and realizing that
maybe violence isn't the only way to solve problems.

All these presidential hopefuls are saying what they'd do to change
the world. You know what I'd do to change the world? I'd make it
mandatory for everybody to travel abroad for a couple months and see
what the rest of the world is really like. You realize that besides
skin color, language and the things that we eat, we're really not
that different. We all want the same things.
---

John Malkin is a local journalist, musician and host of "The Great
Leap Forward," airing at 7 p.m Wednesday nights on Free Radio Santa
Cruz, 101.1FM, freakradio.org .

.

Sunday, January 6, 2008

Antiwar Soldier

An Interview with Naval Petty Officer Jonathan Hutto, Sr.

Antiwar Soldier

http://www.counterpunch.org/volatile01052008.html

By DONNA J. VOLATILE
January 5 / 6, 2008

"Those who start wars, never fight them
and those who fight wars, never like them
and those who write laws, can recite them
and those who fight laws, they live and die by them...
But I know it's time, yes I know it's time to go home..."
Michael Franti and Spearhead (lyrics)

You may have seen him on 60 Minutes, you may have read about him in
the Washington Post, or the L.A. Times but for those of you who don't
know him, you are about to meet Jonathan Hutto, Sr.:

Naval Petty Officer, third class, stationed on board the USS Theodore
Roosevelt, co-founder of the Appeal For Redress Movement and author
of the soon to be released book, Anti-War Soldier. He has also
recently decided to support Congressman Ron Paul's (R-TX) candidacy
for President. I spoke with Jonathan, who is presently on leave, by
phone and we talked about the Redress Movement, ending the war and
why he is supporting Ron Paul.

The wording is simple but the words ring loud and true:

As a patriotic American proud to serve the nation in uniform, I
respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to support the
prompt withdrawal of all American military forces and bases from Iraq
. Staying in Iraq will not work and is not worth the price. It is
time for U.S. troops to come home.-

Mission Statement-Appeal For Redress, October 16, 2006

How is the Redress movement possible? It is possible because of DoD
Directive 1325.6, guidelines for handling dissident and protest
activities among members of the armed forces, which provides that:

DoD policy to preserve military members' "right of expression ... to
the maximum extent possible, consistent with good order and
discipline and the national security." Members of the military may
attend demonstrations but only in the United States and only when
they are off base, off duty, and out of uniform.

And Dod 7050.6, the Military Whistleblower Protection Act and it provides that:

4.1 Members of the Armed Forces shall be free to make a protected
communication to:

4.1.1- A Member of Congress

4.2-4.4- Military members are protected against reprisals for such
communication.

The Appeal for Redress Movement should not be confused with those who
refuse to fight, which Jonathan views as "an extension or result of
unjust government policy", or those who claim conscientious objector
status, which every military member has the right to claim (and they
are protected legally as well).

In fact, the Appeal for Redress Movement discourages both enlisted
personnel and officers (fifteen percent of all Appeal signers are
officers) from going AWOL and hopes that by providing this viable
alternative, active duty personnel will seek constructive ways to
make their voices heard and not give way to despair which quite often
leads to suicide or other (personal) destructive forms of behavior,
which as Jonathan points out: "Is an extension of unjust occupation
of Iraq by our government."

And it seems to be working. "At present, there are over two thousand
active duty personnel who have signed on to the Appeal for Redress
and that number continues to grow. This number represents all
branches of the US Military, includes the National Guard and Reserves
and Individual Ready Reserves, those men and women having completed
their active duty assignment but are consolidated within a special
emergency reserve force", as Jonathan explains.

Organizations who support the Appeal for Redress include: Iraq
Veterans Against the War, Veterans For Peace, Military Families Speak
Out, in addition to active duty service members and their families.

Appeal for Redress co-founder, Jonathan Hutto, Sr. is no stranger to
controversy and crusade. Since he joined the Navy in 2004, he has
tackled issues such as racism on board ship and is out spoken about
many other issues effecting enlisted personnel including sexual
harassment, sexual orientation, the rate of suicides and a wide array
of enlisted service members grievances and Veterans issues which will
largely be addressed in his forth coming book, Anti-War Soldier.

Who is Jonathan Hutto, Sr. and how did the Appeal For Redress Movement begin?

Born and raised in Atlanta, Georgia, Jonathan Hutto, the son of a
small family business owner and whose mother, a graduate of Clark
College, who gave up her teaching career to stay at home to raise her
sons and who had influenced Jonathan with the riveting stories of her
upbringing in the Apartheid South and her exposure to the Civil
Rights Movement , it seemed only natural that Jonathan would
eventually follow in her footsteps to pursue social issues such as
racism, equality, political corruption and the illegality of the war.

While working toward his degree in political science, with a minor in
history, at Howard University, he attended the Million Man March, was
politically active on campus and his local community.

His heroes were Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Malcom X, Rev. Jesse L.
Jackson, Sr. and the late Stokley Carmichael but it wasn't until he
joined the Navy and read a book called Soldiers in Revolt: GI
Resistance During the Vietnam War by Dr. David Cortright that he
fully recognized his political path which would lead him to found the
Appeal for Redress Movement.

Jonathan joined the Navy for the same reasons many do, he wanted to
pursue his Masters degree and needed financial assistance afforded by
military programs and he also felt the need to become more centered
about his life and believed that military service would aid him
toward that end. It did that and more.

The birth of the Appeal for Redress Movement

The birth of the Appeal for Redress was a result of a series of
events. Jonathan had been dealing with a steady stream of racism and
xenophobia on board ship, including an incident where a shipmate
placed a hangman's noose in front of his face, which he reported
through the chain of command. (His shipmate was eventually
reprimanded, losing one rank and restricted to the ship for a period
of 30 days.)

The growing dissent, amongst his military colleagues, concerning the
illegality of the war, the stop-loss policy (extending active duty
tours beyond the contracted agreement), Individual Warrior program
(the back door reserves effecting mostly Army personnel), and more
recently, the Pentagon program of Individual Augmentees which
reassigns Navy personnel and places them under the command of the
Army and Marines, in Iraq and Afghanistan (a kind of back door
conscription), and upon reading Dr. Cortright's book, Soldiers in
Revolt, led Jonathan to organize his first meeting to flesh out the
possibilities of a Redress Movement.

Jonathan Hutto, joined by Liam Madden, a Marine Sergeant from
Vermont, formed the nucleus of the Appeal for Redress movement.

How much Congressional support has the movement gained?

"The response from Congress has been decent, considering the
nontraditional approach of what we are doing. It is not traditional,
nor is it every day for Congress members to hear from active duty
service members. The first member of Congress to endorse the Appeal
For Redress, was Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, followed by John
Conyers of Michigan, Congressman John Lewis of Atlanta, Congressman
James McGovern of Massachusetts, among several others", says Jonathan.

He also believes that as the movement continues to grow, so will
political support for the movement. Not all of the Appeal movement's
Congressional endorsers voting records reflect the level of
commitment that Jonathan would like to see, given the amount of
funding the war continues to receive from the politicians in
Washington, "We need to continue to hold them accountable", insists Jonathan.

How do you feel about the anti-war movement's inability to be
effective, in terms of stopping the war, bringing the troops home,
changing the direction of Congress or even in terms of failing to
unite with the anti-war conservatives?

"I think what the anti-war movement has been effective in doing, at
the beginning of the Iraq war, was mass mobilization and education of
the populace and also in connection with the mobilization that was
happening all over the world and also in terms of effecting change at
the ballot box, from the so-called war party to the party for
perceived change", says Jonathan, "But I think where the anti-war
movement has fallen short, is holding that party, which is now in
power in the Congress and Senate, accountable for following through
on the mandate it was given at the ballot box in 2006. It has also
failed to look at alternative strategies, outside of traditional
strategies that have been used. The Civil Rights Movement had a
strategy of non-violent, direct action but when that strategy started
to break down and when the strategy was no longer effective, people
were willing to look at other forms of dissent such as mass refusal
and militant action. A movement has to be willing to debate all
tactics and strategy."

How do you feel about the Democrats failure to acknowledge the will
of the people? The people continue to struggle to end this war but
they are continually ignored or marginalized by the party?

"Somehow, the people of this country have been oriented to believe
politics is voting and then they wait for the politician, whoever he
or she is, to deliver on what it is that you voted for. But you know,
voting is only meant to be an extension of the 'political process',
that you are already engaged in, the political movement. You know you
are organizing, you are mobilizing, you stop by the ballot box and
you vote, then you organize and mobilize to hold the politicians
accountable. When those things don't work, then it's time to try
something new, we move to potential mass refusal which may lead to
acts of civil disobedience, whatever it may be but we have to make
the government understand, you are not going to govern, you are not
going to occupy another country, in our name and at our expense. We
must continue to engage the ballot process because, as flawed as it
is, it still belongs to us and I believe that ultimately if we are
going to radically change society and if in fact that process doesn't
work, we have to prove to people, practically and pragmatically that
it doesn't but until that process breaks down I think we must engage
it. Malcom X told us years ago it would either be the ballot or the
bullet. If politicians fail to respond in the streets, the masses
will take justice by any and all means in the streets. The recent
collective refusal of the 2nd Platoon in Iraq is a direct result of
no relief from politicians in Washington."

Recently you sent a letter to Ron Paul endorsing his candidacy for
President, tell us about that...

"I believe Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) is serious about ending the
war in Iraq and I believe the anti-war movement should actually
consider voting for him, he's the only candidate representing us (the
anti-war movement) in the Republican party and I am personally going
to vote for him. As a person who doesn't agree with him on
everything, on the issue of the Iraq war, I'm with him ninety
percent, as far as his non-intervention and bringing our troops home.
Supporting Ron Paul is strategic in terms of what needs to happen. I
hope that other people will consider this too. The anti-war movement
needs to give him a serious look The anti-war movement, ninety plus
percent of it is supporting the democratic party and what has the
democratic party done for us on the question of war? They have have
consistently been complicit in funding the war, that's what they have
done. I also believe it is unintelligent for the entire anti-war
movement to be confined within one political party, we need to be
looking at it from a broader based perspective and I'm glad that Ron
Paul is running. The one thing I can say about Ron Paul is that he is
consistent. I think he is very courageous to take the stands on
issues that he does. It is very empowering. I hope more active duty
members and citizens in general will take a better look at his candidacy."

"You know, we are patriots, when I read the Constitution, when I read
the Declaration of Independence, these are beautiful documents, you
know? They actually give you instructions on what to do when your
government is not accountable to the people. The Declaration of
Independence is a radical document. I believe in it and I'm going to
live it. Not just talk about it."

Where do you see us in one year or two years if we don't stop this war?

"Unfortunately, if we do not stop this war, if this war is not
stopped, if we're not able to halt it, I see us losing more friends
around the world, I see more lives being in danger, I see more
American lives being lost, on the ground in both Iraq and
Afghanistan, I see, sadly, more terrorist attacks abroad and
potentially here on our own soil. I see more Imperialists wars, I see
a potential, future attack on Iran, I see the possibility of invasion
of other sovereign countries, perhaps in Pakistan, I see a sharpening
rivalry with Russia and China, in Latin America and other countries
that dare to stand in opposition to US Imperialism. I see more
military recruitment of so-called illegal immigrants in exchange for
citizenship and a lowering of military standards and a continued
breakdown within this country."

"At the same time, what I see as a result of all of this, is that the
people are being forced, especially as things become worse at home,
to make a decision to become involved politically, I believe that if
you don't join the movement to end the war and to change the course
of this country, then the movement's gonna draft you, whether you
like it or not."

Jonathan, thank you for your time and also for your service to our
country. Thank you for joining us in this struggle to end the war and
also for joining us in our struggle to regain our country and the
principles upon which it was founded.

For Jonathan Hutto and others fighting in this illegal war, it is
time to come home.
---

Donna Voltile can be reached at: djvolatile@windstream.net

.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Army orders man to leave sick newborn, return to Iraq

[4 articles]

Army orders man to leave sick newborn, return to Iraq

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/iraq/2004091368_armydad25.html

December 25, 2007
By James Janega
Chicago Tribune

CHICAGO ­ In what was either a Christmas Eve gift ­ or else the
result of a logistical snafu ­ an Army unit in Iraq said Monday it
had decided to extend the personal leave of a Fort Lewis sergeant
whose newborn son is in neonatal intensive care in Indiana.

Sgt. Chris Williams, 24, who has five months to go on his second tour
in Iraq, now has until Friday to report for duty in the United
States, after which he will be shipped back to his unit in Iraq's
volatile Diyala province near Baghdad.

He had made sure his 18-day leave to Crown Point, Ind., coincided
with the due date of his son, Gabriel. But days after Gabriel was
born Dec. 18, the 10-pound infant got a lung infection that requires
a respirator and constant care. A spokeswoman for Munster Community
Hospital in Munster, Ind., said it is unclear when the boy will go home.

Amid the stress of a sick child, a faraway war and the holidays,
Williams and his wife, LeeAnn, have spent the last week living in a
hotel and huddled around an incubator, able to hold their newborn son
for only 20 minutes every three hours as they feed him.

As the soldier's family has been calling congressmen for help and
local newspapers to make their voice heard, some of the confusion
about the extension arose because Williams' commanding officer has
been out on combat operations, said 4th Stryker Brigade spokesman
Maj. Shawn Garcia.

When Williams' company commander returned to base and learned of the
sergeant's plight, he extended the soldier's leave, Garcia said.

"That's definitely good to hear," Williams said Monday, as he and his
wife juggled feedings, families and Christmas. "It has its good
points. I have a baby now, and I was able to spend it with him, even
though he was in the hospital."

Williams was due to return Saturday, just after his newborn's illness
appeared. His request to extend the leave was granted and then
seemingly rescinded last week, and it was unclear whether the Army
technically considered him AWOL, Williams' family said.

The only official word they had to go on was a message on Williams'
home answering machine from a platoon leader in Iraq, urging him to
return quickly.

With mounting anxiety, Williams bought a plane ticket that would get
him back to Fort Lewis on Friday ­ the soonest he could find an open
seat, he said.

On Monday, Garcia said Williams' return date had been moved to Friday
all along.

"We take the welfare of our soldiers and their families very
seriously. The medical condition of Sgt. Williams' newborn son and
the emotional well-being of his family were definite factors in the
chain of command's decision to extend Sgt. Williams' leave," Garcia said.

If conditions do not change for the better, Williams can request
another extension, said Capt. Terassa Pearson, spokeswoman for Task
Force Iron, the unit with responsibility for the sprawling and
turbulent region north of Baghdad.

Though seemingly healthy at birth, Gabriel Douglas Williams developed
a lung infection that has had him in intensive care for days. One of
his doctors, Kongiet Thaera, said the next few days could be critical
for the child, and he advised the first-time father to remain close by.

On Monday, the child was still being given oxygen and was finishing a
course of antibiotics, hospital spokeswoman Mylinda Cane said.

With word that his Army unit ­ Aero Troop of the Second Squadron,
First Cavalry Regiment ­ did not consider him absent without leave,
Williams said he had begun to consider more mundane holiday matters.

He and his wife both had families nearby. They were thinking of
visiting each family in the morning. Or perhaps inviting both to
visit them briefly at the hotel.

Or perhaps ­ most likely ­ just staying close to their son.

Gabriel may be able to come home this week. And if all goes well,
Sgt. Williams will go back to war.

--------

Soldier's leave extension cut short

http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2007/12/24/news/top_news/docaa839bc703cc0454862573bb001f3970.txt

BY CHRISTINE KRALY
ckraly@nwitimes.com
219.662.5335 | Monday, December 24, 2007

MUNSTER | First-time dads face a lot of worries. They usually don't
involve being AWOL from the Army.

Army Sgt. Chris Williams' 18-day leave from duty in Iraq was timed
well for his son's birth Tuesday. Gabriel Douglas was born at a
healthy 10 pounds at The Community Hospital in Munster, Chris' first
child, and the first grandchild for both sides of the family.

But when Gabriel soon developed a lung infection that sent him to the
neonatal intensive care unit, Williams said he requested and was
granted an extension to his leave, until Jan. 3.

The Crown Point native changed his flight to Dec. 30. Relatives paid
for a room at the Hampton Inn across from the hospital for Williams
and his wife, who after she was released, began returning every
couple of hours to feed Gabriel.

But Sunday morning, Williams, who is in his second tour of duty in
Iraq, began listening to the voice mails he'd amassed the past few
days. There were several messages from superiors telling him his
extension had been rescinded.

His superiors hadn't deemed his son's condition life-threatening
enough to stay longer, Williams said. "If I wasn't on a flight by the
22nd, I was going to be AWOL." Chris had to change his flight to Friday.

"It's stressful," Williams said. "You hear about everybody being so
close and like a family. Something like this happens, where I have a
kid in the ICU ..." he said, trailing off. "I'm a soldier, I'm like a
cog in the wheel."

His father, Douglas Williams, said he was "stunned" when he heard
what was happening to his son. Incensed, he contacted U.S. Sens.
Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Evan Bayh, D-Ind., and U.S. Rep. Pete
Visclosky, D-Ind., on Sunday, chronicling his son's experience.

The treatment is especially egregious, Douglas Williams said,
considering the good his son has done for not only the military, but
his community.

Two years ago, a then-22-year-old Williams walked into an attempted
robbery of a woman who had taken money collected for her church to
the Bank Calumet branch inside the Meijer store in Merrillville.

The 2001 Merrillville High School graduate said at the time, "I heard
a lady yell, 'Help, I'm being robbed. He's taking the church money.'"

A bank executive praised Williams and another bank customer in the
days following the incident, saying: "Many times the word 'hero' is
used too loosely, but here's one case where two strangers responded.
In my book, they showed heroism."

Now, a wooden cradle made by Douglas Williams waits for little
Gabriel to get well and come home. So does a baptismal dress, made
from his mother's wedding dress.

Chris Williams is just praying he'll be home long enough to see
Gabriel leave the hospital, let alone be baptized. Douglas Williams
said Gabriel stopped breathing a couple of times Sunday, but seemed
to get better throughout the day. He is on oxygen and antibiotics,
his father said.

The situation has warped Chris Williams' previous ideas of a lifelong
career in the military.

"It's hard to look at the overall, when that's how you know you're
being treated at the time," he said. "It's scary that at the drop of
a hat, this is how they can treat you."

-------

With son in hospital, soldier is denied leave

http://hamptonroads.com/2007/12/son-hospital,-soldier-denied-leave

December 24, 2007
By Jeff Long and Sara Olkon, Chicago Tribune

CHICAGO

During his two tours in Iraq, Army Sgt. Chris Williams has been in
many firefights, but he says a battle with military brass over a
leave extension as his newborn son clings to life has been the scariest.

"It's a lot more stressful," he said Sunday afternoon during an
interview at Munster Community Hospital in Indiana, where his son,
Gabriel, is in intensive care.

"I'm an adult, I'm in the Army," said Williams, 24, of Crown Point,
Ind. "If something happens to me, I can deal with it. But when it's
your kid, it's a lot scarier than anything I've ever been in before."

The Army says Williams' country needs him more than his family does.

"They are fighting a war," said Catherine Caruso, a spokeswoman at
Fort Lewis, near Tacoma, Wash., where Williams' unit is based. "Even
one person missing does have an impact. Sometimes, hard decisions get made."

Gabriel Douglas Williams was born healthy Tuesday, but he developed a
lung infection that put him in intensive care.

One of his doctors, Kongiet Thaera, said the next few days could be
critical - and that the first-time father should remain close.

Initially told by officials at Fort Lewis that he had been granted an
extension to his leave until Jan. 3, Williams learned Sunday morning
that final approval had been denied. Williams said his commander in
Iraq left him a voice mail message saying that he would be "making it
harder on himself" if he did not get on the first available plane.

Williams has booked a flight for Friday, the first he could find, but
says he can't understand why the original extension was canceled. The
Army says it was never officially approved.

"It's like they just write you off and you are a horrible soldier,"
Williams said. "I used to love what I was doing. I have a lot of
military in my family. It was always a good experience. You come
home, and people are thankful for what you are doing."

Now he's rethinking a career in the military.

His father, Douglas Williams, called it flabbergasting that the
military can think it's a good idea for his son to lead troops
overseas when his mind is obviously on his wife, LeeAnn, and their ailing son.

"He's leading people," Douglas Williams said. "His mind has to be on
what he's doing."

He added, "I'm very proud of him," referring to his son's two tours
in Iraq. "But I'm also proud of the fact that he's looking out for
his family. The military should look at it like: 'This is a kid we
want to keep.' "

"Sometimes it's up to the judgment of the commander," said Caruso,
the Army spokeswoman.

She said soldiers often time their 18-day "rest and relaxation leave"
around pending births, as Williams did. In order to extend a leave, a
soldier would need a request for emergency leave approved by the
commanding officer, Caruso said.

"The final decision is really up to his commanding officer," Caruso
said. "At the end of the day, sometimes mission requirements come
into play. It's really his unit's decision."

Caruso said she spoke to Capt. Bruce Wells, the rear detachment
commander to the 2nd Squadron, 1st Cavalry regiment, at Fort Lewis.

"When (Wells) talked to the soldier and found out his situation, he
told him to put together a Red Cross message to process an emergency
leave," Caruso said. "As the end of his R&R leave was approaching,
Capt. Wells told him he would grant a 10-day extension, contingent on
the CO's (commanding officer's) decision."

The final decision to deny the request was made by Williams' first
sergeant, after consulting with the executive officer of the unit.

"The two decided (it) didn't rise to the level of emergency leave,"
Caruso said.

Caruso said it's unlikely Williams would be considered AWOL immediately.

"I don't think so. He wasn't listed that way to my knowledge," she
said. "As long as he is making reasonable efforts to return to his
unit in Iraq."

Williams is waiting to learn if he'll receive the Purple Heart for an
incident in August when the Army truck he was in was hit by a
roadside bomb. All five men inside suffered concussions in the blast,
Williams said.

--------

'AWOL' over sick baby

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/344830_soldier25.html

Soldier called back to Iraq as infant struggles for life

December 24, 2007
By MIKE BARBER
P-I REPORTER

An inspiring quote in a key Army manual for commanders of rear
detachments says soldiers have "two supreme loyalties," to country and family.

But "even the bonds of patriotism, discipline and comradeship are
loosened when the family itself is threatened."

Sgt. Chris Williams, 24, a Fort Lewis 4th Stryker Brigade soldier
home from his second deployment to Iraq, never wanted to test the
idea's validity when he came home to Indiana on leave for the birth
of his first-born in early December.

As he spends Christmas with his newborn son, who is battling for his
life in critical care while his wife remains stressed out from a
difficult delivery, the battle-tested soldier has been told his
extended leave is canceled and to hurry back to Iraq or be declared
AWOL, the soldier's family said Monday.

"My kid and his wife don't need this right now," the soldier's
father, Doug Williams, said.

If ever there was a hardship, this is one, he said.

"This is a career soldier -- or was -- who has been hit with IEDs and
been there for the Army. Before all this, he could have come home
from Iraq for knee surgery but didn't feel right leaving Iraq and all
the guys there. And now with his son in critical care, this is the
response he gets from the military?" Williams said.

Chris Williams serves with the 4,000-member 4th Stryker Brigade,
which left Fort Lewis in April for a 15-month tour of duty. He
returned home for his 15-day leave on Dec. 4 but requested an
extension when his son's condition suddenly worsened hours after the
baby's difficult birth Dec. 18.

Catherine Caruso, a Fort Lewis spokeswoman, said Williams appealed
for emergency leave through the American Red Cross to the 4th Stryker
Brigade's rear detachment. The rear detachment allowed Williams'
leave to be extended after he was unable to get a response from
Williams' chain of command in Iraq, she confirmed.

The rear detachment commander, however, is not in Williams' chain of
command, which is in Iraq, she noted. The rear detachment commander
at Fort Lewis "has no authority to grant leave but is in a position
of some trust and took it upon himself to say (Williams) needed to
stay home," Caruso said.

The decision was based upon information from the American Red Cross,
which handles military requests for emergency leave, she said.

Chris Williams was at Munster Community Hospital in Indiana Monday
and could not be reached for comment.

His family says he followed orders to return and booked the first
flight he could find, slated to leave Friday.

But they and he can't understand the sudden reversal that has added
so much distress to their lives.

On Sunday, Williams' son's condition was downgraded to critical at
almost the same time Williams received the message to return to Iraq,
the soldier's father said.

"The baby's condition worsened 12 hours after he was born," Doug
Williams said. "Sunday morning he stopped breathing twice and had to
be resuscitated. He was sent back to neonatal intensive care, and has
undergone spinal taps."

Williams' family, which includes numerous military retirees
"disgusted" by the turn of events, are outraged, Doug Williams said,
while Illinois public officials are demanding answers from the Army
on their behalf.

Over the weekend, Doug Williams said, an adjutant general said flatly
that Sgt. Williams' extended leave had never been granted.

Yet, he notes, "I have copies of voice mails from a sergeant and
captain at Fort Lewis rear detachment who told him that because we
were running out of time and they had not heard from (commanders in)
Iraq, they were extending his leave to Jan. 3."

There's also the voice mail from his son's commander in Iraq, a
captain, that Williams has retained.

"He told Chris to ignore the previous messages from the rear
detachment and the extension was revoked, that it was not deemed of
any immediate emergency and that he had to be on the first plane back
to Iraq or he would be AWOL," Doug Williams said.

On Monday, Williams said he learned from an Army officer that an
executive officer in Iraq had made the initial decision to rescind leave.

"He didn't ask for the Red Cross to check, like he should have. He
called the hospital from Iraq, asked for the nursery and was told the
baby was discharged from the nursery. Of course he was discharged
from the nursery. He was sent to neonatal intensive care," Williams'
father said, fuming.

Williams said the Army should put more faith in his son's integrity.

"I'll tell you the kind of man Chris is. He joined the Army for six
years instead of the usual four after 9/11," Doug Williams said.

When his son returned to Iraq with Fort Lewis' 4th Stryker Brigade
last spring, Williams said, he had scheduled other soldiers to take
their leaves around Christmastime instead of him. When Chris Williams
learned his wife was pregnant, however, his commanders suggested he
take leave for the December delivery instead.

Williams said his son has been in two Stryker vehicles damaged by
improvised roadway bombs.

He suffered a severe concussion in the first explosion but was back
on patrol two days later when the second hit.

"I was never in the military," the soldier's father said, "but in my
opinion, these are the types of men and women the military wants to
keep, not to chase off."
---

P-I reporter Mike Barber can be reached at 206-448-8018 or
mikebarber@seattlepi.com.

,